If a person has faith in the bible, not just belief the bible has some facts. Then the person has a God, Yhvh, you can skip this. For the doubter let us step up to the plate of logic and feed the mind with intellectual ideas which are true.
We are starting with ideas taken from modern science, and theory, to help show the feasibility of gods. This is a comparison of thoughts with flaws to show flaws.
There are 2 ideas in science called the Singularity. The more accepted is the point in spacetime when everything began and is a vast infinite variable of existence. This infinite variable is the start of existence. Order, chaos, substance, time, space, laws of reality, all such begin at the Singularity. This is the genesis of what is termed “The big bang theory”. It is also the start of “what now is” in everlasting perpetual existence of the universe theory, there are those who reject the “big bang theory”.
The other theory is originally started in the realm of science fiction, but as technology, and the ability for genetic manipulation grew, and as computers have in the past continued to reach ever higher processing speeds, a new idea gained traction. It is the concept of a Singularity of Intelligence, be it organic or inorganic. Though for the most part in the past the scientific community of today has forgotten 1 element of a singularity, perhaps intentionally. A singularity is also by definition the start of infinite intelligence. The celestial definition of singularity in scientific jargon of today does not include the technological definition of singularity which is a description of infinite intelligence which can improve itself. This should be considered. Artificial intelligence studies include this terminology as a real possibility of a true learning growing electronic intelligence.
The question in logic in proper structure is this. Can you as a person deny saying never in the eternal past has a Singularity of Intelligence existed? If you cannot, then it becomes necessary to examine in proper logic the idea of “God existence”. Keep in mind a singularity of intelligence means a self improving intelligence. This includes mankind, animals, and other creatures growing in intelligence. These are no more or less than singularity of intelligence babies or prototypes. Mankind is, so singularities of intelligence = facts. The additional question needs to be presented in precise language. Given the many singularities there have been, shouldn’t it be possible for undiscovered singularities to exist? There is an uncountable number of stars, galaxies, and voids for an undiscovered singularity to live. Why not kill this error before it ever becomes a problem? The math of the probabilities of singularity creation in the infinite past has already proven uncountable due to our ancestors and the thinking creatures on the planet. Why not a quintillion more? One singularity significantly more intelligent and mighty than we, should not be denied. After all there are already smart men in the past who were worshiped as Gods. The bare facts easily kill the denying thesis main arguments. The naysayers arguments are red lined with errors, the mobs of God deniers attempt to ignore infinite time. The results are clear, the bare facts end the argument, and singularities we are. The opposition has no ability to fight against the thesis.
The real issue is simple. In the infinite past, and it is infinite in truth, theories like the big bang cannot prove the destruction of infinite time. In the infinite past, the probability of a singularity of intelligence coming into existence is mathematically greater than 1 up to an unknown quantity. ∞T(PE) ≥1SI Where T time is infinite, multiply by Probability of Existence PE equals or is greater than 1 Singularity of Existence. It is simple childrens mathematics.
There is a second question. Has Singularity of Intelligence come first, or the Universe? If Singularity of Intelligence, then creation of the universe is necessary to examine as proper logic. It is at this point all of the IFs of existence should be questioned in proper structure. Where there are more IFs there is a greater probability the logic strand is not correct, though it may seem very intelligent upon surface examination.
Lets step through the IFs.
Creation.
1) If there is a God who created. Having faith there is can yield a logic direction to any religion which has a God or Agnosticism. It only needs belief in a Singularity of Intelligence able to create matter.
Judiasm
1) If there is a God who created.
2) If the creation God is YHVH.
- If all, some, or 1 Rabbai can be proven to be prophets of YHVH sent with his inspired messages after Jesus was sent, and can disprove Jesus is the messiah in complete detail with no logical loopholes. This does not include the interpretation of prophecy
Christianity.
1) If there is a God who created.
2) If the creation god is YHVH.
3) If YHVH has a son, and his son is Ihsous “Jesus”.
Islam
- If there is a God who created.
2) If the creation god is YHVH.
3)If YHVH sent Jesus as a prophet. - if Revelation 9: 1 to 12 is not a prophetic reference to Mohammad and Islam
- If Jesus was not the son of YHVH
- If the Jews lied about the promises
- If the Muslims can prove prophecy really does match a different group of Semitic people other than the Jews
Paganism
- If there is a god who created.
- If the creation story is consistent in that religion
- If the record teller is not possibly effected by another god of trickery mischief and lies
- If the creation story matches the physical evidence on the earth. I.E. no worlds on turtle backs, whale backs, or other such things like this
- If this religion also is compatible with a worldwide flood.
- If other parts of the religion have fulfilled prophecies, correct dates, and other evidence more stable than the evidence in other religions
Perpetual Existence Theory
1) If discoverable evidence concludes everything always existed - If a Singularity of Existence, or God was not a creator
Part of this is debunked, and fails due to entropy and mass compression theory, this concept being eventually in the past everything was a single solid mass of energy, per modern scientific theory. The theories of unknown existence as a mass of energy is an unknown quantity. This is all the supporters of this theory can say, and this is compatible with the idea of a perpetual existence of YHVH.
Big Bang Theory
1) If nothing exploded and became something
This requires an opinion which rules out a God factor, or a creation Singularity, the energy required is massive, nothing short of Godly.
2) If entropy is not a constant
Entropy as we mortal humans experience it, is a constant. Modern and ancient physics experiments have tried to disprove this and failed every time. Entropy as a Universal Law states energy is lost in systems unless more energy is introduced. As the Universe is a system, it loses energy, and by extension will of course decay.
3)If light speed is a constant
This has been proven incorrect. First with the fluctuation in light speed measured between 1928 to 1945, and second with experiments on photon shape.
4) If space can compress
This concept exists in theory only and had never been measurably proven.
5) If time can compress
This concept exists in theory only and had never been measurably proven.
6) If millions and billions of years
Evidence supporting these lengths of time has valid opposition. Mt. Saint Helens is a prime example of quick fossil creation. While this is not an answer to big bang theory, it does limit peripheral evidence. The length of time supposed by Big Bang theory is dependant on speed of light constants, and spacial compression, and change of entropy laws. If those thing have no measurable variations the theory fails.
It must be stated, a choice should be made, at the logic split between the false pagan gods, and Ahih Yhvh because human beings in our lifetimes simply do not have enough time to study everything concerning this.
At this point unless a considerable amount of work is done, all I can say is I chose Yhvh as my God, though some of those Gods were rejected based on inconsistency with reality.